RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Electronic patient portal (EPP) use has been associated with a number of benefits in the internal medicine setting. Few studies have examined the disparities in and the benefits of EPP utilization among surgical patients. The purposes of this study were to examine factors associated with EPP use among patients undergoing an orthopaedic surgical procedure and to determine if EPP use is associated with improved outcomes or satisfaction after orthopaedic surgical procedures. METHODS: We queried all patients undergoing an orthopaedic surgical procedure from May 2015 to December 2018 at 2 academic medical centers in an integrated hospital system. Patient demographic characteristics, operative characteristics, satisfaction scores, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify disparities in EPP use. Adjusted logistic and linear regressions were then used to assess the association between EPP use and the various outcome metrics while controlling for confounders identified in the previous analysis. RESULTS: Numerous demographic factors were independently associated with EPP use among patients undergoing an orthopaedic surgical procedure, including English speakers compared with non-English speakers (odds ratio [OR], 2.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.01 to 2.79]); African-American or black race (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.48]) and Hispanic race (OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.61]) compared with white race; college education compared with high school education (OR, 2.30 [95% CI, 2.12 to 2.49]); and a surgical procedure for orthopaedic trauma compared with that for the hand or upper extremity (OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.58]) (p < 0.001 for all), among others. EPP use was independently associated with the increased likelihood of completing a PROM (OR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.45 to 1.7]) and a satisfaction survey (OR, 2.38 [95% CI, 2.17 to 2.61]) and improved overall patient satisfaction (mean difference, 2.61 points [95% CI, 1.79 to 3.43 points]) (p < 0.001 for all). Finally, EPP use was independently associated with lower mean no-show rates (6.8% [95% CI, 6.4% to 7.2%] compared with 9.3% [95% CI, 8.9% to 9.7%]). The lower no-show rate for EPP users corresponded to an estimated $218,225 in savings for our institution within the first postoperative year. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified significant disparities in EPP use among patients undergoing an orthopaedic surgical procedure. Given that EPP use was independently associated with lower no-show rates and improved patient satisfaction among patients undergoing an orthopaedic procedure, efforts to reduce these disparities are warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EPPs are increasingly being used by health-care systems to improve communication between providers and patients; however, providers should be aware of and strive to eliminate disparities in EPP utilization among orthopaedic patients. Within orthopaedic surgery, EPPs are associated with a number of benefits, including lower no-show rates and increased patient satisfaction.